Bug 735483

Summary:	Additional certificates signed by DigiNotar CA certificate to be revoked (MFSA 2011-35)
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	unspecified	CC:	ddumas, emaldona, gecko-bugs-nobody, security-response-team, stransky, vdanen, wnefal+redhatbugzilla
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-08-24 16:03:00 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:	682254, 734324, 734325, 734326, 734327, 734328, 735484, 735485, 735486, 735487, 735488, 735489, 735490, 735491, 735492, 735493, 735500, 735501, 735502, 735503, 735504
Bug Blocks:	735482

Description Josh Bressers 2011-09-02 18:58:50 UTC

A previous update marked DigiNotar signed certificates invalid, excluding a
certain subset of certificates that were not marked as untrusted.

It is now believed that all certificates signed by DigiNotar should be
untrusted.

Comment 8 Vincent Danen 2011-09-06 20:29:15 UTC

See the upstream advisory for further details (MFSA 2011-35):

http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-35.html

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-09-06 21:19:56 UTC

This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4

Via RHSA-2011:1266 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1266.html

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2011-09-06 21:41:24 UTC

This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2011:1267 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1267.html

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-09-06 22:22:49 UTC

This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2011:1268 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1268.html