Bug 735932

Summary:	vds_bootstrap: do not download and do not use redhat-lsb
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Dan Kenigsberg <danken>
Component:	vdsm	Assignee:	Dan Kenigsberg <danken>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Kiril Nesenko <knesenko>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.2	CC:	abaron, bazulay, dfediuck, iheim, ilvovsky, mburns, yeylon, ykaul
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	vdsm-4.9-99.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 07:26:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dan Kenigsberg 2011-09-06 07:48:03 UTC

redhat-lsb has a very heavy dependency that slows down installation, while all we need from it is finding OS version.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
vdsm-bootstrap-4.9-96

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. add host from rhevm to a rhel box with no redhat-lsb.rpm
  
Actual results:
redhat-lsb.rpm is installed on rhel box; install time may exceed 8 minutes.

Expected results:
installation works well without redhat-lsb

Comment 1 Itamar Heim 2011-09-06 08:07:20 UTC

need to check what do we rely on, and which rpm may be needed for it (say, /etc/redhat-release)

Comment 2 Dan Kenigsberg 2011-09-06 08:27:17 UTC

Note that the removal of lsb dependency was formerly requested (and denied) in bug 689661.

(and in reply to comment #1)
Itamar, I do not understand your English.

Comment 3 Dan Kenigsberg 2011-09-06 08:41:09 UTC

Posted upstream: http://gerrit.usersys.redhat.com/898

Comment 4 Dan Kenigsberg 2011-09-07 09:54:27 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> need to check what do we rely on, and which rpm may be needed for it (say,
> /etc/redhat-release)

/etc/redhat-release is very very basic, and supplied by several packages redhat-release-*. it is already implicitly required by vdsm.

Comment 6 Dan Kenigsberg 2011-09-08 12:40:54 UTC

*** Bug 736688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 yeylon@redhat.com 2011-09-22 10:46:12 UTC

ic142
vdsm-bootstrap-4.9-104.el6.x86_64

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 07:26:19 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1782.html