Bug 736047
Summary: | SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/gsd-datetime-mechanism from read, write access on the unix_stream_socket unix_stream_socket. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | todd_lewis |
Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 15 | CC: | dominick.grift, dwalsh, mgrepl |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | setroubleshoot_trace_hash:50199ab5de9573ea495e19a450ce38474f4da17cb2439d710a4436d6ec56bfb4 | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-10-07 15:04:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
todd_lewis
2011-09-06 14:16:48 UTC
Is this supposed to be in F15 or Rawhide. It is currently dontaudited in F16. selinux-policy-3.10.0-24.fc16 (In reply to comment #1) > Is this supposed to be in F15 or Rawhide. It is currently dontaudited in F16. > > selinux-policy-3.10.0-24.fc16 F15 was where I generated the bug, from within the SELinux Alert Browser. Didn't notice/don't know why it selected rawhide. Would it be worth loading selinux-policy-3.10.0-24.fc16 on F15 before reporting other SE alerts, or would that just make a mess? I don't want to nag you guys for work you've already done... No if you are using f15 you should only use f15 policy. |