Bug 736388

Summary:	SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/pulse from executing /usr/sbin/fos
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.2	CC:	dwalsh, ksrot
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 10:18:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2011-09-07 15:06:26 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-3.7.19-109.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-109.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-109.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-109.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. get a fresh RHEL-6.2 machine
2. log in as root via ssh
3. run following automated test:
/CoreOS/selinux-policy/Regression/bz584451-piranha-and-ipvsadm
  
Actual results:
----
time->Wed Sep  7 11:03:16 2011
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1315407796.572:325736): arch=c000003e syscall=59 success=no exit=-13 a0=40d219 a1=7fff81e4d3d0 a2=7fff81e4df58 a3=7f75952999d0 items=0 ppid=23164 pid=15173 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=55 comm="pulse" exe="/usr/sbin/pulse" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:piranha_pulse_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1315407796.572:325736): avc:  denied  { execute } for  pid=15173 comm="pulse" name="fos" dev=dm-0 ino=1449036 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:piranha_pulse_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:piranha_fos_exec_t:s0 tclass=file
----

Expected results:
* no AVCs

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-07 15:10:44 UTC

I am fixing a bug in the policy.

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-08 14:29:40 UTC

Fixed in   selinux-policy-3.7.19-110.el6

Comment 4 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-14 11:39:39 UTC

Is this a default port?

Comment 5 Milos Malik 2011-09-14 12:13:59 UTC

# rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/ha/web/secure/help.php
piranha-0.8.5-7.el6.x86_64
# rpm -V piranha
# grep -A 3 -i "heartbeat runs on port" /etc/sysconfig/ha/web/secure/help.php 
Heartbeat runs on port:
        It is possible to alter the port that heartbeat runs on. The default
        if not set is 1050. Normally you should not have to touch this.
</PRE>
#

Comment 6 Daniel Walsh 2011-09-15 14:53:20 UTC

cma             1050/udp                # CORBA Management Agent

Comment 7 Daniel Walsh 2011-09-15 14:53:55 UTC

We currently have 

corenet_udp_bind_apertus_ldp_port(piranha_pulse_t)
corenet_udp_bind_cma_port(piranha_pulse_t)


Should we label this port as either of these?

Comment 8 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-15 17:02:55 UTC

(In reply to comment #7)
> We currently have 
> 
> corenet_udp_bind_apertus_ldp_port(piranha_pulse_t)
> corenet_udp_bind_cma_port(piranha_pulse_t)

This is a fix which I added to Fedora. Will add to RHEL6.
> 
> 
> Should we label this port as either of these?

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:18:29 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html