Bug 737074
Summary: | update request: hunspell 1.3.2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Reinout van Schouwen <reinouts> |
Component: | hunspell | Assignee: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 15 | CC: | caolanm |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-09-16 11:35:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Reinout van Schouwen
2011-09-09 14:13:49 UTC
Its in rawhide already. The hunspell-nl of F15 doesn't need it, right ? I'm not sure if a bump to 1.3 would require a rebuild of everything in F15 that links against it, i.e. new soname and/or abi changes. I'm generally reluctant to mess with the stable released fedoras. (In reply to comment #1) > The hunspell-nl of F15 doesn't need it, right? That's correct. However, as soon as the new OpenTaal dictionary 2.1.0 is out, an update to hunspell-nl and the firefox/libreoffice langpacks would be in order as well. > sure if a bump to 1.3 would require a rebuild of everything in F15 that links > against it, i.e. new soname and/or abi changes. I'm generally reluctant to mess > with the stable released fedoras. I couldn't say if it would require a rebuild, but I do know the new version brings some significant improvements to the Dutch spellchecker. hmm, ideally would be great to identify what commits brought in the required changes/improvements and selectively take them if possible. http://hunspell.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/hunspell/hunspell/src/hunspell/ According to the OpenTaal project leader, the changes that lead toward 1.3 were almost all driven by the requirements for Dutch, so I'm afraid that cherry-picking patches doesn't make sense. Yeah, looking through it that seems to be the case alright. Hmm, pseudo- keep the same soname but upgrade to 1.3.2 sounds also a horror, there are subtle api changes too which may have an effect on non-rebuilt libs even then. I'd rather not mess with the released stable release with a effectively base lib of so many applications. |