Bug 737495
Summary: | selinux prevets radiusd search on /tmp | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Milos Malik <mmalik> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | dpal, dwalsh, mmalik, syeghiay |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 10:18:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 743047 |
Description
Karel Srot
2011-09-12 10:14:47 UTC
Any idea why radiusd needs this access? This same issues was reported in Fedora as bug 730843, please see the comments there. Short story is we do not yet know what is trying to access /tmp. FreeRADIUS is large and complex so it's hard to know if some part of the code is trying to access /tmp but from static code inspection it doesn't seem to. However FreeRADIUS also links with a lot of libraries, any of which could be the culprit. I think we need to run FreeRADIUS under the debugger and break when open() is called on a path containing /tmp to figure out where this is occurring. Lets just dontaudit the access and be done with it. In the past tools have listed the contents of /tmp looking for files like keberos host or cc cache files. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html |