Bug 738156

Summary:	different contexts on configs / init scripts related to dhcpd / dhcpd6
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6	Reporter:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component:	selinux-policy	Assignee:	Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.2	CC:	dwalsh
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-12-06 10:18:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2011-09-14 07:38:39 UTC

Description of problem:
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf	system_u:object_r:dhcp_etc_t:s0
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd6.conf	system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0
/etc/rc.d/init.d/dhcpd	system_u:object_r:dhcpd_initrc_exec_t:s0
/etc/rc.d/init.d/dhcpd6	system_u:object_r:initrc_exec_t:s0

I believe that both configuration files should have the same context and both init scripts should have the same context.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-14 07:45:35 UTC

Yes, there is a bug.

Comment 2 Daniel Walsh 2011-09-15 14:35:30 UTC

It seems that F16 has these correct.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:18:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html