Bug 739628

Summary: seinfo -r displays 12 roles and 1 type
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2CC: dwalsh
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 10:19:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milos Malik 2011-09-19 16:39:17 UTC
Description of problem:
I'm not sure if the bug belongs to selinux-policy or setools.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.15.el6.i686
policycoreutils-gui-2.0.83-19.15.el6.i686
policycoreutils-python-2.0.83-19.15.el6.i686
selinux-policy-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-110.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# seinfo -r

Roles: 13
   guest_r
   lsassd_t
   staff_r
   user_r
   git_shell_r
   logadm_r
   object_r
   sysadm_r
   system_r
   webadm_r
   xguest_r
   nx_server_r
   unconfined_r
# seinfo -r | grep _t
   lsassd_t
#
  
Actual results:
* 12 roles + 1 type are displayed

Expected results:
* 12 roles are displayed

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-19 16:59:02 UTC
This is caused by

seutil_run_semanage(lsassd_t, lsassd_t)

should be

seutil_run_semanage(lsassd_t, system_r)


Good catch.

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2011-09-20 15:31:37 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-112.el6

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 10:19:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1511.html