Bug 740255
| Summary: | New Flag: qe_test_coverage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Chris Ward <cward> |
| Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | Simon Green <sgreen> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Chris Ward <cward> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 3.6 | CC: | ebaak, leiwang, sgreen, syeghiay |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-09-22 13:46:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 740258, 740260, 740262, 741608 | ||
|
Description
Chris Ward
2011-09-21 13:14:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Only members of QE group should have access to setting it Who should be able to view this? All users? All redhat users? or just QE group users? Who should be able to request this (i.e. set it to '?')? All users? All redhat users? or just QE group users? At this time, only QE should be able to view/set it. We might later need bug bot to be able to set it too... but we can deal with that later, if necessary. Two more things. 1) Should this flag be visible on bugs in all products, or just some products? 2) I also need "a comprehensive description of this type" 1) all products Do you have any examples of 2) that i can look at as a reference for writing the description? (In reply to comment #4) > Do you have any examples of 2) that i can look at as a reference for writing > the description? It can be anything you want. For qa_ack, it is "Quality Assurance Acknowledgement" qe_test_coverage = "Quality Assurance Bugzilla Test Coverage Review" Seem reasonable? Hi, i see in the test instance a field called 'New Test'; is that i new RFE you're working on? Could you tell me the bug #? eg, under the qe-conditional-nak field https://bug740258.bz-devel.eng.bne.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705048 (In reply to comment #6) > qe_test_coverage = "Quality Assurance Bugzilla Test Coverage Review" > Seem reasonable? Indeed it does. This flag has been added to the live servers ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ), staging server ( https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/ ), and the Brisbane development server. (In reply to comment #7) > Hi, i see in the test instance a field called 'New Test'; is that i new RFE > you're working on? Could you tell me the bug #? No, it was just me testing something. I have removed this custom field. -- simon Wow, fast! I like it! I see there is a additional input field attached to this flag. I don't think that's necessary... Is it required? (In reply to comment #9) > I see there is a additional input field attached to this flag. I don't think > that's necessary... Is it required? No, and it is now gone. Flag looks good! Will let you know if I come across anything else. Chris and Simon, not really CLOSED just yet. Simon, when anyone makes a flag change, please run it by program-management. I just filed an RT #125247 to change the bugbot [approve] rule to exclude this flag. Right now, when a bug is approved, it is also changing the qe_test_coverage flag from ? to +, which is not what you want. Chris, there are a bunch of rhel-5.8.0 bugs that had their qe_test_coverage flag set from ? to +. |