Bug 74056
Summary: | Kernel documentation ignores packaging system. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Mike MacCana <mikemaccana> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | null | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-09-14 13:20:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Mike MacCana
2002-09-14 00:24:54 UTC
We package the Linux kernel documentation as is. The kernel-source package is meant for code that needs our kernel source tree to build against, not for rebuilding the kernel Rebuilding the kernel is done like every other package (rpm --install something.src.rpm; rpmbuild -ba SPECS/something.spec) Thanks for your response Alan. This differs from Red Hat's Customization guide, which suggests users use the kernel-source package for building custom kernels. http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/custom-guide/ch-custom-kernel.html Two things: * Should the Customization guide be modifed to reflect the method suggested by Alan above? * If the method used in the customization guide is indeed correct, can the kernel suggest users create a packaged kernel rather than an unpackaged one? * Can this be reopened? Thanks, Mike |