Bug 741105

Summary: dynamic linker/loader display dump
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: jurek.bajor
Component: glibcAssignee: Jeff Law <law>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 14CC: fweimer, jakub, schwab, sgraf
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-03 18:04:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description jurek.bajor 2011-09-25 11:48:24 UTC 
Description of problem:
$ /lib/ld-linux.so* --list libXft.so.2
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc.i686                      2.13-2                            @update

$ ls -l /lib/ld-linux.so.2 
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 10 Sep 19 00:43 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.13.so

How reproducible:
as above

Steps to Reproduce:
1. as above
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
as above

Expected results:
?

Additional info:
ABRT:
Package:    	glibc-2.13-2
Latest Crash:	Sun 25 Sep 2011 01:30:36 PM 
Command:    	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 --list libXft.so.2
Reason:     	Process /lib/ld-2.13.so was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Comment:    	None

Not tested on F15 and F16.
Comment 1 jurek.bajor 2011-09-25 12:03:36 UTC 
Additional dump.
$ /lib/ld-linux.so* --verify libXft.so.2
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Questionable response - what does that mean ?
$ /lib/ld-linux.so* --verify `which xterm`
6

JB
Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2011-11-14 19:43:49 UTC 
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 3 Jeff Law 2012-01-25 18:44:33 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 767146 ***
Comment 4 Jeff Law 2012-02-03 17:55:48 UTC 
Reopening as 767146 is marked as private
Comment 5 Jeff Law 2012-04-17 04:01:28 UTC 
*** Bug 812859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***