Bug 741422

Summary: Role/Users: Footer for role modification view should not be transparent
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Eric Helms <ehelms>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.1CC: mmccune
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-22 17:58:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 747354    
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot none

Description Corey Welton 2011-09-26 19:16:45 UTC 
Description of problem:
Said DIV is clear, which means when it overruns certain parts of the UI, it gets garbled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Create around 10 new users
2.  Create a role, navigate to it in the roles view, select Users
3.  Scroll down, noting the role modification view window moves with you; reach the bottom of the page.
  
Actual results:
Text in the footer interferes with modification window UI

Expected results:
Maybe this div shouldn't be transparent.

Additional info:
Not actually sure if this will get fixed with the footer work or not.  If so, we can close.
Will attach screenshot.
Comment 1 Corey Welton 2011-09-26 19:19:21 UTC 
Created attachment 524956 [details]
screenshot
Comment 2 Eric Helms 2011-09-29 17:44:05 UTC 
commit e9583fc09fb5f3bb30fca0186173ec60ad64edfd

The problem was more related to the roles UI sliding tree expanding in height when lots of list elements were present which is not intended behavior.  This has been fixed and should address the above issues.
Comment 3 Corey Welton 2011-12-19 16:34:46 UTC 
Verified.
Comment 6 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:03:43 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist