Bug 74233

Summary:	can't expand Adaptec SCSI 2110s RAID 5 under RH 7.3
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	scott alley <scott>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.3
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i686
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-09-30 15:39:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description scott alley 2002-09-18 13:35:44 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; H010818)

Description of problem:
Adaptec confirmed an issue with expanding a RAID 5 with their SCSI RAID 2110s 
card under RH 7.3.  We need to expand from 3 to 4 disks.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Try to run Adaptec Storage Manager Pro to expand the RAID set.
2.
3.
	

Actual Results:  Expand is unavailable.

Additional info:

Adaptec confirmed and issue with RH 7.3 (ext3 problem?).  I would like an email 
when this is resolved.

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2002-09-18 13:38:32 UTC

I have no information from adaptec about this issue and your report is not
exactly full of information (what kernel? 2.4.18-10 I assume)

Comment 2 scott alley 2002-09-18 13:58:09 UTC

The kernel from uname -a 2.4.18-3 #1.
I'm kind of new at this, and will provide any information that I can.

Comment 3 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:39:55 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/