Bug 743775

Summary: Procmail can't read recipie files
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Janina Sajka <janina>
Component: procmailAssignee: Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: bugs.michael, jskarvad
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-06 14:52:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Janina Sajka 2011-10-06 01:03:43 UTC
My ~/.procmailrc contains include statements in order that I can keep
my various recipies separately. My log is full of ""Couldn't read [path]/[filename]." The path/filename is
correct, is uid:gid my user, with permissions 770. I've also tried 775.



How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
Install Fedora 16 Beta from Tuesday, 4 October
Run procmail with includes in ~/.procmailrc.

  
Actual results:
Log indicates "Couldn't read [path]/[filename]
Mail is not processed according to recipies and goes to the default folder only.
Expected results:
Procmail should read and process recipies.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2011-10-06 08:46:01 UTC
Additional info from test list:

| I neglected to say that my /home is a separate partition which was NOT
| formatted during the F-16 beta install, though my / was a clean install.
|
| My /home is btrfs, if that matters, though this problem wasn't around
| the past weeks whilst I've been running F-16 Alpha (installed via yum).

btrfs may be important, because my /home is a separate LUKS ext4 on LVM, and my procmailrc works fine also with INCLUDERC statements.

Do you get any SELinux denials?

Comment 2 Janina Sajka 2011-10-06 14:52:43 UTC
Ah, indeed. A restorecon on the included recipies did the trick
Sorry for the noise.