Bug 74384

Summary:	file system error
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Need Real Name <superyunch>
Component:	kernel	Assignee:	Arjan van de Ven <arjanv>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	7.3
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	athlon
OS:	Linux
URL:	192.0.0.12
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-12-17 02:47:59 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2002-09-23 01:08:38 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)

Description of problem:
Whenever after reboot the computer, all binary files on the second partition 
was changed (although size not changed) and cannot run any more.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.huge disk ATA RAID (4X WD120G ATA100 disks,0+1 RAID results in 240G virtual 
space)
2.plug RAID card in 66M PCI slot
3.creat more than two partitions on the RAID virtual disk
4.binary files on the second partion.
5.reboot computer	

Actual Results:  All binary software files on the second partion become 
unuseable. And some files attribute becomes strange like this: ?rwxrwxrwx, 
even root cannot del these files because the '?'. Very occasionally the ascII 
files be changed by adding number of '@' in the begining. No error found if 
using other OS like WindowsXP, FreeBSD.

Additional info:

Kernel: kernel-2.4.18-3_athlon_smp
mainboard: Tyan2466N-4M
CPU: 2X Athlon MP 2000+ 
RAID card: RocketRAID133
harddisk: 4X WD 120G ATA100 / no hard disk on system ATA slot
RAM:1.5G
On another computer (all components are the same except that the hard disks 
are Seagate 60G ATA100 X4) we cannot see the bug.

Comment 1 Arjan van de Ven 2002-09-23 08:16:01 UTC

unfortionatly linux currenlty doesn't support the highpoint raid in raid0+1 mode
(only in raid0)

Comment 2 Arjan van de Ven 2002-09-23 08:16:27 UTC

*** Bug 74385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***