Bug 744067

Summary: Promotions - Errata - need some cleanup on Details and Packages tabs
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Brad Buckingham <bbuckingham>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.1CC: cwelton, mmccune
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-22 17:59:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 747354    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Errata Packages screenshot
none
Errata Details screenshot none

Description Brad Buckingham 2011-10-06 21:31:39 UTC 
Description of problem:

Now that we're able to sync in some actual errata and view it in the UI, we need to do a bit of cleanup on the format.  See below.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
git master

How reproducible:
always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. sync a repo that has errata (e.g. RHEL6)
2. go to Content Management -> Promotions
3. go to All Errata or select the product and then Errata
  
Actual results:
see attachments

Expected results:
on General, we need some jscrolling to improve usability and improved formatting on the Associated Bugs

on Packages, we need some improved formatting of the package list 

Additional info:
Comment 1 Brad Buckingham 2011-10-06 21:32:31 UTC 
Created attachment 526801 [details]
Errata Packages screenshot
Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2011-10-06 21:32:59 UTC 
Created attachment 526802 [details]
Errata Details screenshot
Comment 3 Brad Buckingham 2011-12-14 14:59:44 UTC 
Formatting for errata panes cleaned up based on 'real' errata.
Comment 4 Corey Welton 2012-01-25 16:53:26 UTC 
QA Verified.
Comment 7 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 17:59:43 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist