| Summary: | Traceback shown while registering and server having "Internal Server Error" | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Pavel Holica <pholica> | ||||
| Component: | rhn-client-tools | Assignee: | Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 6.2 | CC: | cperry, jpazdziora, mkhusid, syeghiay | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-08 19:46:06 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 691780 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Comment 1
Milan Zázrivec
2011-10-10 10:30:56 UTC
But there is no error message, there is traceback. User shouldn't see any traceback. If I set serverURL in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/up2date to point to URL which always returns 500 (ISE), I get a nice error message "We could not contact Satellite or Proxy at ...", which comes from _chooseServerPageApply. So if the server returns 500 (ISE) in consistent manner, the user will see a nice error message right at the beginning. If the first page passes thou, we don't catch the exceptions much beyond this point and leave it on firstboot to handle it, thus the tracebacks. I am not sure the effort to address all the places where the exception can appear and to QA it is worth the benefit, with subscription manager being available. I therefore propose WONTFIX, while acknowledging that we would probably be able to address it properly given we spend enough man hours on the issue. Mike, could you give the product management's ruling on this bug? |