| Summary: | Mock's spec file erroneously requires python >= 2.6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Davi Arnaut <davi> |
| Component: | mock | Assignee: | Clark Williams <williams> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | el6 | CC: | mebrown, williams |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-10-12 22:06:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Davi Arnaut
2011-10-10 10:45:47 UTC
the reason it does so is that the mock-1.1.x series is not intended to be run on EPEL5; the mock 1.0.x series is for EPEL5. This originally was done due to python-decoratortools not being available on RHEL5/EPEL5. But strangely it now seems to be there. I'm looking at whether we can drop the 1.0.x series and just run 1.1.x on EPEL5, but for now if you're running mock on RHEL5/CENTOS5, please use mock-1.0.x. Yeah, python-decorator is there. Anyway, the point is that the spec should reflect the real requirement and not be used to signal a minimum distribution requirement. For what it's worth, it mostly works fine with the exception of chroot --userspec and --setopt not being available. |