| Summary: | ntpd.service needs to be ordered after named.service | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Scott Shambarger <scott-fedora> |
| Component: | ntp | Assignee: | Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar> |
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 15 | CC: | mlichvar, pertusus |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-07 06:37:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Scott Shambarger
2011-10-12 08:07:38 UTC
What errors exactly do you see? If it's not "host name not found (permanent)", it shouldn't be a problem, ntpd is designed to work even when started without network or working DNS. Is the number of servers specified in ntp.conf equal to the number of servers reported by ntpq -pn? Sorry, for some reason I never received the notification of your comment... I upgraded to F16 in January, and no longer have copies of the F15 logs from Oct '11, so I'm afraid I can't paste them, or test ntpq -pn. However, after upgrading to F16, I reverted to the 'shipped' ntpd.service file (and have ntp-4.2.6p4-1 installed), and I haven't seen the errors since. The bug may still exist in F15, but I'm afraid I have no easy was to test it. If no one else is reporting the issue, we might as well close the bug... I'll open a new bug if I encounter the issue again in F16. Thanks! |