Bug 746824

Summary: Review Request: dnssec-check - A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Wes Hardaker <wjhns174>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Paul Wouters <pwouters>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: bct, notting, package-review, pwouters
Target Milestone: ---Flags: pwouters: fedora-review+
jkeating: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-25 02:06:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Wes Hardaker 2011-10-17 20:55:43 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-check.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-check-1.11-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description: DNSSEC-Check provides a GUI mechansim for scanning the system's
 configured DNS resolvers to see if they support DNSSEC.  For each test
 the utility displays a graphical red/green light indicating the result
 of the test.  Clicking on a light will explain the status of the light
 and what was tested.

Comment 1 Wes Hardaker 2011-10-27 21:11:14 UTC
http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15.src.rpm
http://www.hardakers.net/temp/dnssec-check.spec

Updated to the upstream 1.11.p2 to add a man page and COPYING file and fix the .desktop file.

Comment 2 Ben Thompson 2011-10-27 23:04:26 UTC
Note on the spec file, it contains a spelling mistake in the %description 'mechanism'. Didn't find any issues that apply to current Fedora version. Mock build completed successfully.

Comment 3 Wes Hardaker 2011-10-28 04:05:56 UTC
Ben: thanks; I've fixed that in my local copy.

Comment 4 Paul Wouters 2011-11-01 20:30:39 UTC
for upstream:

mainwindow.cpp: In member function 'void MainWindow::getAnswers()':
mainwindow.cpp:247:57: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*'

rpmlint:

[paul@bofh paul]$ rpmlint /home/paul/SRPMS/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.src.rpm /home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm /home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-debuginfo-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
dnssec-check.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mechansim -> mechanism
(none): E: no installed packages by name /home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


MUST items:

* OK: Complies to package nameing guidlines
* OK: matches base package
* OK: Meets package guidelines
* OK: Valid license BSD matches source code
* OK: Written in Americanized engish as required 
* OK: COPYING packaged in %doc
* OK: spec file legible
* OK: source matches upstream source
* OK: package compiles and builds on main architecture
* OK: buildrequires good, rebuilds in mock 
* OK: no bad locale handling
* OK: no libraries, no ldconfig calls in post/postun
* OK: not relocatable
* OK: does not create or need to own directories
* OK: no duplicate files listed
* OK: Does not bundle other libraries
* OK: macro use consistent
* OK: package contains code or permissable content
* OK: no large document files
* OK: no header files in base package
* OK: no static libraries
* OK: no .so files in base package
* OK: no devel package dependancy issues
* OK: package does not contain .la/.a files
* OK: gui dnssec-check.desktop properly installed with desktop-file-install
* OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages. 
* OK: filenames are valid UTF-8

SHOULD items:

* No translation of description/summary in other languages available
* Reviewer tested build in mock and found no missing BuildRequires
* no scriplets present
* no subpackages present
* no pkgconfig present
* no outside file dependancies
* WARN: missing man page for dnssec-nodes  Encourage upstream to write one :)

PASS

Comment 5 Wes Hardaker 2011-11-01 20:54:38 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: dnssec-check
Short Description:A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers
Owners: hardaker
Branches: f14 f15 f16 el6

Comment 6 Jesse Keating 2011-11-01 22:25:46 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-11-02 17:26:56 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-11-02 20:04:21 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-11-02 20:05:09 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-11-03 21:52:23 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 02:06:41 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 02:25:09 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 02:32:54 UTC
dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.