Bug 746956

Summary:	[RFE] WebUI interface for repo sync include / exclude lists
Product:	[Community] Spacewalk	Reporter:	Michael Mráka <mmraka>
Component:	WebUI	Assignee:	Tomas Lestach <tlestach>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	1.6	CC:	aronparsons, cperry, dyordano
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-22 11:53:16 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	737830

Description Michael Mráka 2011-10-18 11:57:16 UTC

Description of problem:
spacewalk-repo-sync is able to filter packages from externa repo via --include/--exclude options.
There's also a database table rhnContentSourceFilter which can hold the include/excludeinformation for the repos but there's no way how to insert this filter lists from webUI.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spacewalk-backend-1.6.33-1
spacewalk-schema-1.6.22-1
spacewalk-java-1.6.62-1

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. go to https://<spacewalk>/rhn/channels/manage/repos/RepoEdit.do?id=<xxx>
and try to specify include/exclude package lists for the repo
  
Actual results:
no way

Expected results:
there's a way ;)

Additional info:

Comment 2 Aron Parsons 2012-09-29 22:16:19 UTC

I've added the methods to support this on the backend as of spacewalk-java-1.8.152-1.  I also added API calls and an interface via spacecmd.  I'm not much of a web UI guy so I didn't do anything there, but I thought I'd let you guys know that the backend is there for this to implemented in the web UI now.

Comment 3 Dimitar Yordanov 2014-05-22 11:53:16 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1084522 ***