Bug 747972

Summary: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/unbound from 'name_bind' accesses on the tcp_socket port 8953.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: François Kooman <fkooman>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: dominick.grift, dwalsh, mgrepl
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:2fabb829e8711e2c2d6c603a0179c37e44bdc32114ff8e10aeba15164676016e
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-21 15:13:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description François Kooman 2011-10-21 15:01:29 UTC
libreport version: 2.0.6
executable:     /usr/bin/python
hashmarkername: setroubleshoot
kernel:         3.1.0-0.rc10.git0.1.fc16.x86_64
reason:         SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/unbound from 'name_bind' accesses on the tcp_socket port 8953.
time:           Fri Oct 21 17:01:11 2011

description:
:SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/unbound from 'name_bind' accesses on the tcp_socket port 8953.
:
:*****  Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests  ***************************
:
:If you believe that unbound should be allowed name_bind access on the port 8953 tcp_socket by default.
:Then you should report this as a bug.
:You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
:Do
:allow this access for now by executing:
:# grep unbound /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol
:# semodule -i mypol.pp
:
:Additional Information:
:Source Context                system_u:system_r:named_t:s0
:Target Context                system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0
:Target Objects                port 8953 [ tcp_socket ]
:Source                        unbound
:Source Path                   /usr/sbin/unbound
:Port                          8953
:Host                          (removed)
:Source RPM Packages           unbound-1.4.13-1.fc16
:Target RPM Packages           
:Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.10.0-40.fc16
:Selinux Enabled               True
:Policy Type                   targeted
:Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
:Host Name                     (removed)
:Platform                      Linux (removed)
:                              3.1.0-0.rc10.git0.1.fc16.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Oct 19
:                              05:02:17 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64
:Alert Count                   1
:First Seen                    Fri 21 Oct 2011 05:00:51 PM CEST
:Last Seen                     Fri 21 Oct 2011 05:00:51 PM CEST
:Local ID                      c39a0dbc-2999-40a7-ba90-e6213941a0ba
:
:Raw Audit Messages
:type=AVC msg=audit(1319209251.386:547): avc:  denied  { name_bind } for  pid=29937 comm="unbound" src=8953 scontext=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:unreserved_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket
:
:
:type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1319209251.386:547): arch=x86_64 syscall=bind success=no exit=EACCES a0=7 a1=17b2af0 a2=1c a3=7fffef733fec items=0 ppid=1 pid=29937 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=unbound exe=/usr/sbin/unbound subj=system_u:system_r:named_t:s0 key=(null)
:
:Hash: unbound,named_t,unreserved_port_t,tcp_socket,name_bind
:
:audit2allow
:
:#============= named_t ==============
:allow named_t unreserved_port_t:tcp_socket name_bind;
:
:audit2allow -R
:
:#============= named_t ==============
:allow named_t unreserved_port_t:tcp_socket name_bind;
:

Comment 1 François Kooman 2011-10-21 15:09:37 UTC
It seems to work fine as soon as I disable the remote control:

# Remote control config section. 
remote-control:
        # Enable remote control with unbound-control(8) here.
        # set up the keys and certificates with unbound-control-setup.
        # Note: required for unbound-munin package
        control-enable: no

Comment 2 François Kooman 2011-10-21 15:13:11 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 732833 ***