Bug 748644

Summary:	llvm-devel 2.8 lacks llvm/Support/Signals.h
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	postmodern <postmodern.mod3>
Component:	llvm	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	15	CC:	bos, dmalcolm, josephusmullally, michel
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-10-27 23:25:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description postmodern 2011-10-25 00:42:59 UTC

Description of problem:

I was attempting to compile ccons (https://code.google.com/p/ccons/), and noticed that it requires llvm/Support/Signals.h. This file should be included in llvm-devel, but for some reason is missing.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.8


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install llvm-devel
2. ls /usr/include/llvm/Support/Signals.h
3.
  
Actual results: missing


Expected results: exists


Additional info:

Comment 1 jhackworth 2011-10-27 21:54:24 UTC

I am running into the same problem on a different platform.

It looks like System/Signals.h was renamed to Support/Signals.h in change 2.8 -> 2.9, which ccons is using now. (so bug might be invalid).

http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_28/include/llvm/Support/
http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_29/final/include/llvm/Support/

You may have to try an older version of ccons, try porting it back to 2.8, or upgrade llvm.

Comment 2 postmodern 2011-10-27 23:24:27 UTC

Ah ha. I've submitted an issue to ccons about the different paths in 2.8 vs. 2.9.

https://code.google.com/p/ccons/issues/detail?id=17&thanks=17&ts=1319757785

Comment 3 postmodern 2011-10-27 23:25:12 UTC

Ah ha. I've submitted an issue to ccons about the different paths in 2.8 vs. 2.9.

https://code.google.com/p/ccons/issues/detail?id=17&thanks=17&ts=1319757785