Bug 749055 (libkactivities)
Summary: | Review Request: libkactivities - API for using and interacting with Activities | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | christoph.wickert, jreznik, kevin, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | jreznik:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-11-04 15:01:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 656997 |
Description
Rex Dieter
2011-10-26 00:10:34 UTC
Name: ok Summary: ok Release: ok Version: ok License: not ok, GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ (actual library) and (CC-BY or BSD) for ontology URL: ok Sources: ok (md5sum d69d42e8521c4a7c01991222572c2cab) BRs: ok Requires: ok Conflicts: ok Description: ok Devel subpackage: ok Macros used consistently: ok Ldconfig usage: ok Uses smpflags: ok No docs/license file provided, contact upstream to fix it (actually I promised it, so I should go through all packages and report it, during BDS). Files: ok So in -devel: ok rpmlint libkactivities-6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3480646 ok Please fix the license issue, otherwise package is ok. I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure, there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up being GPLv2+ The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+ (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure, > there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of > those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up > being GPLv2+ What I remember we agreed on not using aggregated licenses, didn't we? It's just reminder, if we do not want to follow it, then it's ok for me to approve this. one. > The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via > onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those > generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+ Ok, makes sense. Meh, we can sort out the licensing details later... :) %changelog * Fri Nov 04 2011 Rex Dieter <rdieter> 6.1 -2 - License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libkactivities/libkactivities-6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Ok, thanks Rex. APPROVED New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: libkactivities Short Description: API for using and interacting with Activities Owners: than jreznik kkolfer ltinkl rdieter rnovacek Branches: f16 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Dropped kkolfer, not a valid FAS account. Sorry for the typo. Imported. |