Bug 749320
Summary: | Review Request: xinput_calibrator - A generic touchscreen calibration program | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthieu Saulnier <casper> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | d.bz-redhat, martin.gieseking, notting, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | martin.gieseking:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc15 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-11-26 19:26:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthieu Saulnier
2011-10-26 17:49:19 UTC
Taking the review. Stay tuned. Here's the formal review of your package. It's in pretty good shape. Just a few minor comments: - I recommend to use the %{version} macro in Source0 in order to simplify future updates. - Add the files Changelog and README to the %docs. - Don't add the .gz suffix to the manpage because the compression format might change. Replace it by an asterisk: %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* - Add INSTALL="install -p" to 'make install' so that the timestamps of the manpage, .desktop file, etc. are preserved. - If you plan to build the package for EPEL < 6 as well, you must add a BuildRoot field, a %clean section and clean the buildroot at the beginning of %install. In case you targeting Fedora and EPEL 6 only, leave everything as is. You might want to remove the %defattr line in %files, though. It's not required for Fedora any longer either. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-15-x86_64/result/*.rpm xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xinput -> input, x input, Putin xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mis -> mus, mos, mid xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US recalibrates -> re calibrates, re-calibrates, calibrates xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US evdev -> evade xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xorg -> xor, org, Borg xinput_calibrator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone, cons xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xinput -> input, x input, Putin xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mis -> mus, mos, mid xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US recalibrates -> re calibrates, re-calibrates, calibrates xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US evdev -> evade xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xorg -> xor, org, Borg xinput_calibrator.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US conf -> con, cone, cons xinput_calibrator-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xinput -> input, x input, Putin xinput_calibrator-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xinput -> input, x input, Putin 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. The above spelling errors are false positive and can be ignored. --------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - MIT acccording to source file headers [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum xinput_calibrator-0.7.5.tar.gz* 20da0a2055a5a75962add8c6b44f60fa xinput_calibrator-0.7.5.tar.gz 20da0a2055a5a75962add8c6b44f60fa xinput_calibrator-0.7.5.tar.gz.upstream [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+] MUST: When compiling C, C++, or Fortran files, %{optflags} must be applied. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: If a package installs files below %{_datadir}/icons, the icon cache must be updated. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. [+] MUST: .desktop files must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. EPEL <= 5 only: [X] MUST: The spec file must contain a valid BuildRoot field. [X] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [X] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [X] SHOULD: Timestamps of files should be preserved. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. (In reply to comment #2) > - I recommend to use the %{version} macro in Source0 in order to simplify > future updates. Done > - Add the files Changelog and README to the %docs. Added > - Don't add the .gz suffix to the manpage because the compression format > might change. Replace it by an asterisk: > %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* Done > - Add INSTALL="install -p" to 'make install' so that the timestamps of the > manpage, .desktop file, etc. are preserved. Added > - If you plan to build the package for EPEL < 6 as well, you must add a > BuildRoot field, a %clean section and clean the buildroot at the beginning > of %install. In case you targeting Fedora and EPEL 6 only, leave everything > as is. I don't plan to build for EPEL < 6 > You might want to remove the %defattr line in %files, though. It's > not required for Fedora any longer either. Removed Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/xinput_calibrator.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc15.src.rpm OK, the package looks good and is ready for check-in. ---------------- Package APPROVED ---------------- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: xinput_calibrator Short Description: generic touchscreen calibration program Owners: fantom Branches: f15 f16 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.el6 xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc15 xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc16 xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. xinput_calibrator-0.7.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. |