Bug 750474
| Summary: | luci didn't start | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Timm Stamer <timm2k> |
| Component: | luci | Assignee: | Jan Pokorný [poki] <jpokorny> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | cluster-maint, Colin.Simpson, jpokorny |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-11-02 21:07:03 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Timm Stamer
2011-11-01 09:15:40 UTC
Sorry, workaround only fixes service luci start, but luci isn't running after it.
cat /var/log/luci/luci.log:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/paster", line 9, in <module>
load_entry_point('PasteScript==1.7.3', 'console_scripts', 'paster')()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line 84, in run
invoke(command, command_name, options, args[1:])
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line 123, in invoke
exit_code = runner.run(args)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/script/command.py", line 218, in run
result = self.command()
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/script/serve.py", line 274, in command
relative_to=base, global_conf=vars)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/script/serve.py", line 308, in loadserver
relative_to=relative_to, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 210, in loadserver
return loadobj(SERVER, uri, name=name, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 224, in loadobj
global_conf=global_conf)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 248, in loadcontext
global_conf=global_conf)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 278, in _loadconfig
return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 363, in get_context
object_type, name=name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py", line 528, in find_config_section
self.filename))
LookupError: No section 'init' (prefixed by 'server') found in config /var/lib/luci/etc/luci.ini
Removing PID file /var/run/luci/luci.pid
luci-0.22.2-14.el6_0.1 works fine. (yum downgrade luci) Updating luci to 0.23.0-13.el6 again moves the running config to luci.ini.rpmsave and doesn't create a new one. luci.db is fine after upgrading. I cannot reproduce your issue. Answering following questions would help me to understand the problem: 1/ You have encountered it with fresh installation of luci, have you? 2/ Do you use any external yum repository such as EPEL? 3/ What output do you get running following command: # rpm -q -- luci TurboGears2 pyOpenSSL python python-babel python-beaker \ python-cheetah python-decorator python-decoratortools python-formencode \ python-genshi python-mako python-markdown python-markupsafe python-myghty \ python-nose python-paste python-paste-deploy python-paste-script \ python-peak-rules python-peak-util-addons python-peak-util-assembler \ python-peak-util-extremes python-peak-util-symbols \ python-prioritized-methods python-pygments python-pylons python-repoze-tm2 \ python-repoze-what python-repoze-what-pylons python-repoze-who \ python-repoze-who-friendlyform python-repoze-who-testutil python-routes \ python-setuptools python-simplejson python-sqlalchemy python-tempita \ python-toscawidgets python-transaction python-turbojson python-tw-forms \ python-weberror python-webflash python-webhelpers python-webob \ python-webtest python-zope-filesystem python-zope-interface \ python-zope-sqlalchemy Yes, it is a fresh installation. Yes, I use EPEL. - Installed EPEL packages: jabberpy.noarch 0.5-0.21.el6 @epel-x86_64-server-6/6.1 python-repoze-who-friendlyform.noarch 1.0.8-2.el6 @prod-epel-x86_64-server-6 python-tw-forms.noarch 0.9.9-3.el6 @prod-epel-x86_64-server-6 rpm -q --...: luci-0.23.0-13.el6.x86_64 TurboGears2-2.0.3-4.el6.noarch pyOpenSSL-0.10-2.el6.x86_64 python-2.6.6-20.el6.x86_64 python-babel-0.9.4-5.1.el6.noarch python-beaker-1.3.1-6.el6.noarch python-cheetah-2.4.1-1.el6.x86_64 python-decorator-3.0.1-3.1.el6.noarch python-decoratortools-1.7-4.1.el6.noarch python-formencode-1.2.2-2.1.el6.noarch python-genshi-0.5.1-7.1.el6.x86_64 python-mako-0.3.4-1.el6.noarch python-markdown-2.0.1-3.1.el6.noarch python-markupsafe-0.9.2-4.el6.x86_64 python-myghty-1.1-11.el6.noarch python-nose-0.10.4-3.1.el6.noarch python-paste-1.7.4-1.el6.noarch python-paste-deploy-1.3.3-2.1.el6.noarch python-paste-script-1.7.3-4.el6.noarch python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-9.2582.1.el6.noarch python-peak-util-addons-0.6-4.1.el6.noarch python-peak-util-assembler-0.5.1-1.el6.noarch python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-4.1.el6.noarch python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-4.1.el6.noarch python-prioritized-methods-0.2.1-5.1.el6.noarch python-pygments-1.1.1-1.el6.noarch python-pylons-0.9.7-2.el6.noarch python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.5.a4.el6.noarch python-repoze-what-1.0.8-6.el6.noarch python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-4.el6.noarch python-repoze-who-1.0.13-2.el6.noarch python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0.8-2.el6.noarch python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.4.rc1.el6.noarch python-routes-1.10.3-2.el6.noarch python-setuptools-0.6.10-3.el6.noarch python-simplejson-2.0.9-3.1.el6.x86_64 python-sqlalchemy-0.5.5-2.1.el6.noarch python-tempita-0.4-2.el6.noarch python-toscawidgets-0.9.8-1.el6.noarch python-transaction-1.0.1-1.el6.noarch python-turbojson-1.2.1-8.1.el6.noarch python-tw-forms-0.9.9-3.el6.noarch python-weberror-0.10.2-1.el6.noarch python-webflash-0.1-0.2.a9.el6.noarch python-webhelpers-0.6.4-4.el6.noarch python-webob-0.9.6.1-3.el6.noarch python-webtest-1.2-2.el6.noarch python-zope-filesystem-1-5.el6.x86_64 python-zope-interface-3.5.2-2.1.el6.x86_64 python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.4-3.el6.noarch Without packages from EPEL it works! # yum erase jabberpy.noarch python-repoze-who-friendlyform.noarch python-tw-forms.noarch # yum install luci --disablerepo=*epel* # service luci start Adding following auto-detected host IDs (IP addresses/domain names), corresponding to `foo.bar.tld' address, to the configuration of self-managed certificate `/var/lib/luci/etc/cacert.config' (you can change them by editing `/var/lib/luci/etc/cacert.config', removing the generated certificate `/var/lib/luci/certs/host.pem' and restarting luci): (none suitable found, you can still do it manually as mentioned above) Generating a 2048 bit RSA private key writing new private key to '/var/lib/luci/certs/host.pem' Start luci... [ OK ] Thanks and sorry! My fault... Based on my experience, I actually suspected EPEL. I have to state that there is no guarantee that luci will work properly when unsupported packages (mostly those mentioned above) collide with luci's runtime environment. When external yum repository is needed and the respective packages tend to supersede the distribution's ones -- as just observed with EPEL offering newer python-repoze-who-friendlyform and python-tw-forms -- it is advisable to edit respective repository definition (e.g., /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo added with installation of epel-release package) and exclude colliding packages. In this case, line like this might help (be aware of "python-*" impact): --- exclude=python-* TurboGears2 pyOpenSSL --- This is also suggested in related bug 741324 comment 5. Also, I am going to close this bug as a clone to that one. Side note: But to be honest, what is the real problem in this particular case (at least from what I have seen) is broken consistency between EPEL's RPM and contained Python package metadata, more specifically package dependencies. I have filled bug 750931 to address this. Still and once again, luci + EPEL packages combination is discouraged. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 741324 *** I wanted to add a diff of that "rpm -q" command results between that in comment 5 and what I got on an updated RHEL 6.1 box without EPEL: > -python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0.8-2.el6.noarch > +python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.3.b3.el6.noarch > [...] > -python-tw-forms-0.9.9-3.el6.noarch > +python-tw-forms-0.9.9-1.el6.noarch In other words, these are exactly the packages obtained from EPEL (first of which is the problematic one as described in bug 750931). |