Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 750524

Summary: Better error message needed to indicate if there is no CS replication agreement with another server
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Namita Soman <nsoman>
Component: ipaAssignee: Rob Crittenden <rcritten>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1CC: dpal, grajaiya, jgalipea, mkosek
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ipa-2.2.0-1.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:15:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 756082    

Description Namita Soman 2011-11-01 13:31:04 UTC
Description of problem:
If there is no CS replication agreement between 2 servers, any action to delete it, indicates that it cannot contact the LDAP server. Should instead say - that there is no replication agreement with the server.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ipa-server-2.1.3-6.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install master, replica
do not install CS on replica

2.Remove replication agreement about Replica, where there isn’t one
# ipa-csreplica-manage del ipa-replica.testrelm -p XXX 

  
Actual results:
Error:
Unable to delete replica ipa-replica.testrelm: Can't contact LDAP server

Expected results:
Error:
No replication agreement with XXX

Additional info:

Comment 2 Dmitri Pal 2011-11-01 17:48:52 UTC
Upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2048

Comment 5 Gowrishankar Rajaiyan 2012-03-08 07:05:29 UTC

:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'remoteExec root 10.16.98.181 redhat "ipa-replica-manage del ipaqavma.testrelm.com"'
:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'egrep "'ipaqavmd.testrelm.com' has no replication agreement for 'ipaqavma.testrelm.com'" /tmp/remote_exec.out'
...
:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'remoteExec root 10.16.98.181 redhat "ipa-csreplica-manage del ipaqavma.testrelm.com -p Secret123"'
:: [   PASS   ] :: Running 'egrep "'ipaqavmd.testrelm.com' has no replication agreement for 'ipaqavma.testrelm.com'" /tmp/remote_exec.out'

Verified: ipa-server-2.2.0-3.el6.x86_64

Comment 7 Martin Kosek 2012-04-19 11:24:45 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No documentation needed.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:15:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0819.html