| Summary: | Inconsistency in privilege names. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Gowrishankar Rajaiyan <grajaiya> |
| Component: | ipa | Assignee: | Rob Crittenden <rcritten> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.2 | CC: | mkosek |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-11-14 08:06:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Gowrishankar Rajaiyan
2011-11-03 09:38:03 UTC
This may be inconsistent but I don't see it as something we can correct because these names are already in the wild. I agree. Trying rename/move these privileges could cause much more harm than good. Closing as WONTFIX as per comments above. |