Bug 751914

Summary:

Add drift compliance to inventory summary report

Product:

[Other] RHQ Project

Reporter:

John Sanda <jsanda>

Component:

drift

Assignee:

Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn>

Status:

CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE

QA Contact:

Mike Foley <mfoley>

Severity:

unspecified

Docs Contact:

Priority:

medium

Version:

4.2

CC:

loleary

Target Milestone:

---

Target Release:

JON 3.0.0, RHQ 4.3.0

Hardware:

Unspecified

OS:

Unspecified

Whiteboard:

Fixed In Version:

4.3

Doc Type:

Bug Fix

Doc Text:

Story Points:

---

Clone Of:

Environment:

Last Closed:

Type:

---

Regression:

---

Mount Type:

---

Documentation:

---

CRM:

Verified Versions:

Category:

---

oVirt Team:

---

RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Cloudforms Team:

---

Target Upstream Version:

Embargoed:

Bug Depends On:

Bug Blocks:

707225, 751474

Attachments:

Description	Flags
inventory summary report	none

Description John Sanda 2011-11-08 02:43:04 UTC

Description of problem:
The inventory summary report should be updated to show the following:

* which types support drift monitoring
* which types have resources out of compliance
* which types have all resources in compliance

Drilling down on a particular type should show which resources are out of compliance. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jay Shaughnessy 2011-11-11 22:17:17 UTC

Should be working now. Please test.

Comment 2 Mike Foley 2011-11-14 15:55:41 UTC

Created attachment 533558 [details]
inventory summary report

Comment 3 Mike Foley 2011-11-14 15:57:47 UTC

verified as follows:

1) created simple drift defintion
2) viewed Reports-->Inventory Summary
3) observed entire "In Compliance?" column is blank

discussed with jsanda

documenting what i see and attaching screenshot to BZ

returning BZ to jsanda as this does not look right to me.

jsanda, can you describe what i should be seeing in the report for compliance when i have a pinned defintion?

Comment 4 Jay Shaughnessy 2011-11-15 03:34:15 UTC

master     commit 88aaa3b1ec22fd04ced1281db43c60a01e12f974
release3.x commit:  a8c48ad2e851ddbb4b03e7f802d5831b5aaab89a

test notes
For more on the definition of drift compliance see:
http://rhq-project.org/display/RHQ/Drift+Management#DriftManagement-Terminology

Comment 5 Mike Foley 2011-11-15 18:13:53 UTC

I am still not seeing anything in the "In Compliance?" column.  (  I did in the sprint 8 demo, but not in  the build).  I will retest again tomorrow in case the build I have didn't pick up this change.

Comment 6 Jay Shaughnessy 2011-11-16 16:42:03 UTC

Mike, sorry, the change did not get pushed to release branch as
noted above. It is there now:

release3.x commit 1facedce68f988d8b2905e0854f010f6fbdda441

Comment 7 Mike Foley 2011-11-16 16:56:05 UTC

i have retested on 11/16 in the release branch ... and still do not see anything.  i will again retest tomorrow.

Comment 8 Mike Foley 2011-11-17 15:42:19 UTC

verified 11/17 jon 3 branch

Comment 9 Larry O'Leary 2012-01-20 21:08:56 UTC

Part of the change for this was committed to master as part of http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=rhq/rhq.git;a=commit;h=6a9ab0dfe846cdf9ae64e52d3a755ba9c8bd38ca

Comment 10 Mike Foley 2012-02-07 19:25:21 UTC

marking VERIFIED JON 3 bugs to CLOSED/CURRENTRELEASE

Comment 11 Mike Foley 2012-02-07 19:29:20 UTC

changing status of VERIFIED BZs for JON 2.4.2 and JON 3.0 to CLOSED/CURRENTRELEASE