Bug 753543
Summary: | Packaging MariaDB in Fedora | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Colin Charles <byte> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | byte, dennis, rvokal, tcallawa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-13 19:09:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Colin Charles
2011-11-13 09:47:23 UTC
As I mentioned to you when we spoke last Colin, I see no reason why MariaDB could not be packaged using alternatives. Conflicting or Obsoleting MySQL would not be permitted. ... is this intended to be a package review bug? Or a general RFE? Closing this - if someone wants MariaDB, they can open a package review. |