Bug 753977

Summary: Depsolve problem with gcc
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: NM <andrew.kavalov>
Component: gccAssignee: Jakub Jelinek <jakub>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: aravindvijayan224185, jakub
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-16 02:30:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description NM 2011-11-15 01:19:38 UTC
Description of problem:
Fresh FC16 instalation. 
Depsolve error message below: 

yum install gcc
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, protectbase, refresh-packagekit
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package gcc.x86_64 0:4.6.2-1.fc16 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: cpp = 4.6.2-1.fc16 for package: gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12 for package: gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package cpp.x86_64 0:4.6.2-1.fc16 will be installed
---> Package glibc-devel.x86_64 0:2.14.90-14 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.14.90-14 for package: glibc-devel-2.14.90-14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.14.90-14 for package: glibc-devel-2.14.90-14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers for package: glibc-devel-2.14.90-14.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package glibc.i686 0:2.14.90-14 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.14.90-14 for package: glibc-2.14.90-14.i686
--> Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so for package: glibc-2.14.90-14.i686
--> Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so(NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3) for package: glibc-2.14.90-14.i686
---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.14.90-14 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 for package: glibc-headers-2.14.90-14.x86_64
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers for package: glibc-headers-2.14.90-14.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Package glibc.i686 0:2.14.90-14 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.14.90-14 for package: glibc-2.14.90-14.i686
---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64 0:3.1.0-7.fc16 will be installed
---> Package nss-softokn-freebl.i686 0:3.12.10-6.fc16 will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: glibc-2.14.90-14.i686 (fedora)
           Requires: glibc-common = 2.14.90-14
           Installed: glibc-common-2.14.90-15.1.x86_64 (@updates-testing)
               glibc-common = 2.14.90-15.1
           Available: glibc-common-2.14.90-14.x86_64 (fedora)
               glibc-common = 2.14.90-14
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


I have no idea when v 15.1 been installed ahead of compatible v 14, and how i can get updated version of gcc compatible with v 15.1?

Sorry if this is not a bug. 
Thanks for you time.

Comment 1 Aravind vijayan 2011-11-15 15:34:22 UTC

Hi NM,
      Thanks for your report but i think it is not a bug.

Please try an update by: yum update

if it is not able to solve your problem:

i think you are installed a pre-release with updates-testing enabled. and... now updates-testing is turned off. either re-enable updates-testing or run: yum distro-sync to downgrade to only stable updates can help you get-rid of this problem.Anyway i think it is not a bug.





-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 2 NM 2011-11-16 00:11:30 UTC
Thanks a lot for the help. 

Indeed, I do recall enabling updates-testing during installation from DVD. That was a problem a guess. Just ran yum distro-sync. Worked like a charm. Thank you again. 

Regards,
NM

Comment 3 Aravind vijayan 2011-11-16 02:30:32 UTC
Hi NM,
     Thanks for your replay . Let me close this report.

Comment 4 NM 2011-11-16 03:10:32 UTC
Yes, please, go ahead.