| Summary: | wrong %if in spec file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Doncho Gunchev <dgunchev> |
| Component: | python-nose | Assignee: | Luke Macken <lmacken> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | a.badger, fschwarz, lmacken, pfrields |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-11-16 16:11:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Fixed in rawhide. This was only at the very top of the spec file correct? If so, I think that the mistake won't do any harm as the macros being defined in that section are being defined by %{! python_sitelib: DEFINE_MACRO?} Which says, if the macro doesn't exist, define it as this.
So the fix will get picked up the next time we have a build.
If you think my analysis is incorrect or I failed to see another place in the spec that needs changing, feel free to reopen.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=python-nose.git;a=commitdiff;h=0c3f2b41d369dc1d737306ec14e6db55655df8cc
|
Description of problem: python-nose.spec contains: %if 0%{?rhel} < 13 && 0%{?rhel} < 5 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): python-nose-1.1.2-1.fc16.src.rpm How reproducible: Always Additional info: Easy fix :-)