| Summary: | Remove flex expiry code from client side | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | James Bowes <jbowes> | |
| Component: | subscription-manager | Assignee: | Bryan Kearney <bkearney> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list> | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | 5.7 | CC: | bkearney, cduryee, jsefler, syeghiay, wpoteat | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | |||
| Target Release: | 5.8 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
| Doc Text: |
No description necessary
|
Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 768506 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-02-21 06:42:55 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 715031, 768506, 771700, 772019 | |||
|
Description
James Bowes
2011-11-16 13:04:55 UTC
*** Bug 754426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** What QE verification do you suggest for this bug? John, I added a brief comment to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768506, does that help? Verification of this bug is mostly on the developer's end since it is a task to clean dead source code surrounding the removal of unused flex expiry code. Verification that the Flex Expiry OID has been removed from a granted entitlement cert is demonstrated here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754426#c4 Following the suggestion in comment 3, we will use the results of our automated tests to catch regressions and report new bugs as appropriate. For now we'll move this bug to VERIFIED since last night's continuous integration automation run encountered no-break results.
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
No description necessary
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0154.html |