Bug 755200

Summary: Images opens in Wine Internet Explorer by default
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ivan Romanov <drizt72>
Component: shared-mime-infoAssignee: Bastien Nocera <bnocera>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 19CC: andreas.bierfert, bnocera, christoph.wickert, stefan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-17 13:58:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ivan Romanov 2011-11-19 12:44:57 UTC
Description of problem:
I use XFCE. When I am opening any image with double click or xdg-open image.jpg it opens in Wine Internet Explorer. I can change such behaviour but I think Internet Explorer mustn't being used for this.

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install wine
2. xdg-open image.jpg
  
Actual results:
Will be started Wine Internet Explorer

Expected results:
Would be started Ristretto Photo Viewer

Comment 1 Andreas Bierfert 2011-11-20 11:13:12 UTC
Wine IE provides this mime type (as it should because it has the viewing ability). Whatever you set as 'default' for your desktop environment is your choice.

Comment 2 Ivan Romanov 2011-11-20 11:33:12 UTC
I didn't set anything as 'default'. Can you explain why Wine IE has highest priority than default XFCE image viewer? I don't think that most of users want to have such behaviour.

Comment 3 Christoph Wickert 2013-02-17 14:11:01 UTC
There is no priority other than what is defined in /usr/share/applications/defaults.list. If an application is not in there, the selection becomes random. This being said, we need more applications in the defaults list, not only the ones from GNOME.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 14:01:21 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19

Comment 5 Fedora End Of Life 2015-01-09 16:52:20 UTC
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora 
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is 
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no 
longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will
be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2015-02-17 13:58:20 UTC
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.