Bug 755671
Summary: | abrt incorrectly describes kernel warnings as crashes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthew Garrett <mjg> |
Component: | abrt | Assignee: | Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 16 | CC: | dfediuck, dvlasenk, iprikryl, jfeeney, jmoskovc, kklic, mmilata, mtoman, npajkovs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-12-14 11:58:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 744774 |
Description
Matthew Garrett
2011-11-21 17:55:06 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 639068 *** Not really a duplicate - warnings shouldn't be reported to the user at all. (In reply to comment #2) > Not really a duplicate - warnings shouldn't be reported to the user at all. - I don't understand it, so if users are not supposed to know about the warnings why to print them to logs when kernel is compiled without the debugging flags? If I remember correctly even the old kerneloops tool did that... After thinking more about this ... We can make abrt to just notify user about the warnings, but not allow him to report it (like we did with the broken bios warnings: #701171), but can someone guarantee that all kernel devs use warnings consistently? AFAICT they don't ... |