Bug 756123
| Summary: | Autofs mount of NIS described home directories hiccups at login | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Bill Kanawyer <bill> |
| Component: | autofs | Assignee: | Ian Kent <ikent> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | charlieb-fedora-bugzilla, igeorgex, ikent, lpoetter, roland, thomas |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-12-12 10:29:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Bill Kanawyer
2011-11-22 18:11:18 UTC
This problem was easily duplicated and is the same as the problem seen in bug 709637 except that now NetworkManager has added support for systemd so the workaround in bug 709637 no longer works. I was able to get console logins to work by putting nm-online in the autofs init script like this: --- autofs.orig 2011-11-23 11:00:24.454269899 +0800 +++ autofs 2011-11-23 10:10:21.144499136 +0800 @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ fi fi + nm-online + s=`ypwhich` echo "ypwhich $s" The login then worked ok. I then had a problem with the graphical login and found that using "setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs 1" resolved that. Your next question is probably "will this be put into the F16 package" and the answer is I'm not sure. The problem with this is that we still don't know if NIS will be bound when autofs starts and that is the main reason for not just doing the above change while we are waiting for systemd support in autofs. I've been frustrated by this problem for some time now (like yourself no doubt, but for different reasons). First when I added code to enable autofs to wait for the master map to become available (which worked fine in testing) the person asking for the change was either unable or unwilling to give much more than "it doesn't work" so that option was a no go. Also, I couldn't find an answer to the "should or shouldn't have a $ on the dependency" in documentation I looked at so that was a no go and finally the flat out refusal of the NetworkManager folks to wait for the network interface to be available at startup by default. More recently the systemd implementation has come along quite well and the systemd folks seem more willing to offer reasoned and sensible reasons for difficulties resulting from the implementation so autofs will support systemd and that will be available in F17. That doesn't necessarily do anything for you right now because policy requires systemd support not be added to a package during a current release. We have a couple of choices: 1) Get an exception and add systemd support in F16. 2) Add the workaround above to the init script and hope for the best, although we should have some feedback from the ypbind maintainer on this and if possible be sure NIS will bind before autofs starts. 3) Obtain the Rawhide autofs source rpm build it and assit with testing systemd support. I expect to add that in the next couple of days but haven't done any real testing yet. This option might also lead to option 1, who knows. Ian (In reply to comment #1) > This problem was easily duplicated and is the same as the problem > seen in bug 709637 except that now NetworkManager has added support > for systemd so the workaround in bug 709637 no longer works. > > I was able to get console logins to work by putting nm-online > in the autofs init script like this: > > --- autofs.orig 2011-11-23 11:00:24.454269899 +0800 > +++ autofs 2011-11-23 10:10:21.144499136 +0800 > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ > fi > fi > > + nm-online > + > s=`ypwhich` > echo "ypwhich $s" > > The login then worked ok. > > I then had a problem with the graphical login and found that > using "setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs 1" resolved that. > > Your next question is probably "will this be put into the > F16 package" and the answer is I'm not sure. > > The problem with this is that we still don't know if NIS will > be bound when autofs starts and that is the main reason for > not just doing the above change while we are waiting for > systemd support in autofs. > > I've been frustrated by this problem for some time now > (like yourself no doubt, but for different reasons). > > First when I added code to enable autofs to wait for the > master map to become available (which worked fine in > testing) the person asking for the change was either unable > or unwilling to give much more than "it doesn't work" so > that option was a no go. Also, I couldn't find an answer > to the "should or shouldn't have a $ on the dependency" > in documentation I looked at so that was a no go and > finally the flat out refusal of the NetworkManager folks > to wait for the network interface to be available at > startup by default. > > More recently the systemd implementation has come along > quite well and the systemd folks seem more willing to > offer reasoned and sensible reasons for difficulties > resulting from the implementation so autofs will support > systemd and that will be available in F17. > > That doesn't necessarily do anything for you right now > because policy requires systemd support not be added to > a package during a current release. > > We have a couple of choices: > 1) Get an exception and add systemd support in F16. > 2) Add the workaround above to the init script and > hope for the best, although we should have some > feedback from the ypbind maintainer on this and > if possible be sure NIS will bind before autofs > starts. > 3) Obtain the Rawhide autofs source rpm build it and > assist with testing systemd support. I expect to > add that in the next couple of days but haven't > done any real testing yet. This option might also > lead to option 1, who knows. > > Ian I'll test out the workaround fix and provide feedback; we've been hand patching Red Hat and Fedora for years around here to tickle them into operating in our off the beaten path environment. I'll also think about your choices to see if I can add anything. (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This problem was easily duplicated and is the same as the problem > > seen in bug 709637 except that now NetworkManager has added support > > for systemd so the workaround in bug 709637 no longer works. > > > > I was able to get console logins to work by putting nm-online > > in the autofs init script like this: > > > > --- autofs.orig 2011-11-23 11:00:24.454269899 +0800 > > +++ autofs 2011-11-23 10:10:21.144499136 +0800 > > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ > > fi > > fi > > > > + nm-online > > + > > s=`ypwhich` > > echo "ypwhich $s" > > > > The login then worked ok. > > > > I then had a problem with the graphical login and found that > > using "setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs 1" resolved that. > > > > Your next question is probably "will this be put into the > > F16 package" and the answer is I'm not sure. > > > > The problem with this is that we still don't know if NIS will > > be bound when autofs starts and that is the main reason for > > not just doing the above change while we are waiting for > > systemd support in autofs. > > > > I've been frustrated by this problem for some time now > > (like yourself no doubt, but for different reasons). > > > > First when I added code to enable autofs to wait for the > > master map to become available (which worked fine in > > testing) the person asking for the change was either unable > > or unwilling to give much more than "it doesn't work" so > > that option was a no go. Also, I couldn't find an answer > > to the "should or shouldn't have a $ on the dependency" > > in documentation I looked at so that was a no go and > > finally the flat out refusal of the NetworkManager folks > > to wait for the network interface to be available at > > startup by default. > > > > More recently the systemd implementation has come along > > quite well and the systemd folks seem more willing to > > offer reasoned and sensible reasons for difficulties > > resulting from the implementation so autofs will support > > systemd and that will be available in F17. > > > > That doesn't necessarily do anything for you right now > > because policy requires systemd support not be added to > > a package during a current release. > > > > We have a couple of choices: > > 1) Get an exception and add systemd support in F16. > > 2) Add the workaround above to the init script and > > hope for the best, although we should have some > > feedback from the ypbind maintainer on this and > > if possible be sure NIS will bind before autofs > > starts. > > 3) Obtain the Rawhide autofs source rpm build it and > > assist with testing systemd support. I expect to > > add that in the next couple of days but haven't > > done any real testing yet. This option might also > > lead to option 1, who knows. > > > > Ian > > I'll test out the workaround fix and provide feedback; we've been hand patching > Red Hat and Fedora for years around here to tickle them into operating in our > off the beaten path environment. > > I'll also think about your choices to see if I can add anything. Sorry for the delay; other demands on my time. I can confirm this work around was satisfactory. It represents a simple change we can put into production. For the record however, I was confused by your diff as the line numbering differed from the image I have. Here's my diff: testbed> diff -c /etc/init.d/autofs.ori /etc/init.d/autofs *** /etc/init.d/autofs.ori 2011-12-02 13:21:49.323652852 -0500 --- /etc/init.d/autofs 2011-12-02 11:40:32.712110832 -0500 *************** *** 84,89 **** --- 84,93 ---- rm /dev/$DEVICE fi fi + nm-online + + s=`ypwhich` + echo "ypwhich $s" echo -n $"Starting $prog: " $prog $OPTIONS --pid-file /var/run/autofs.pid (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > This problem was easily duplicated and is the same as the problem > > > seen in bug 709637 except that now NetworkManager has added support > > > for systemd so the workaround in bug 709637 no longer works. > > > > > > I was able to get console logins to work by putting nm-online > > > in the autofs init script like this: > > > > > > --- autofs.orig 2011-11-23 11:00:24.454269899 +0800 > > > +++ autofs 2011-11-23 10:10:21.144499136 +0800 > > > @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ > > > fi > > > fi > > > > > > + nm-online > > > + > > > s=`ypwhich` > > > echo "ypwhich $s" > > > > > > The login then worked ok. > > > > > > I then had a problem with the graphical login and found that > > > using "setsebool -P use_nfs_home_dirs 1" resolved that. > > > > > > Your next question is probably "will this be put into the > > > F16 package" and the answer is I'm not sure. > > > > > > The problem with this is that we still don't know if NIS will > > > be bound when autofs starts and that is the main reason for > > > not just doing the above change while we are waiting for > > > systemd support in autofs. > > > > > > I've been frustrated by this problem for some time now > > > (like yourself no doubt, but for different reasons). > > > > > > First when I added code to enable autofs to wait for the > > > master map to become available (which worked fine in > > > testing) the person asking for the change was either unable > > > or unwilling to give much more than "it doesn't work" so > > > that option was a no go. Also, I couldn't find an answer > > > to the "should or shouldn't have a $ on the dependency" > > > in documentation I looked at so that was a no go and > > > finally the flat out refusal of the NetworkManager folks > > > to wait for the network interface to be available at > > > startup by default. > > > > > > More recently the systemd implementation has come along > > > quite well and the systemd folks seem more willing to > > > offer reasoned and sensible reasons for difficulties > > > resulting from the implementation so autofs will support > > > systemd and that will be available in F17. > > > > > > That doesn't necessarily do anything for you right now > > > because policy requires systemd support not be added to > > > a package during a current release. > > > > > > We have a couple of choices: > > > 1) Get an exception and add systemd support in F16. > > > 2) Add the workaround above to the init script and > > > hope for the best, although we should have some > > > feedback from the ypbind maintainer on this and > > > if possible be sure NIS will bind before autofs > > > starts. > > > 3) Obtain the Rawhide autofs source rpm build it and > > > assist with testing systemd support. I expect to > > > add that in the next couple of days but haven't > > > done any real testing yet. This option might also > > > lead to option 1, who knows. > > > > > > Ian > > > > I'll test out the workaround fix and provide feedback; we've been hand patching > > Red Hat and Fedora for years around here to tickle them into operating in our > > off the beaten path environment. > > > > I'll also think about your choices to see if I can add anything. > > Sorry for the delay; other demands on my time. > > I can confirm this work around was satisfactory. It represents a simple change > we can put into production. > > For the record however, I was confused by your diff as the line numbering > differed from the image I have. Here's my diff: > > testbed> diff -c /etc/init.d/autofs.ori /etc/init.d/autofs > *** /etc/init.d/autofs.ori 2011-12-02 13:21:49.323652852 -0500 > --- /etc/init.d/autofs 2011-12-02 11:40:32.712110832 -0500 > *************** > *** 84,89 **** > --- 84,93 ---- > rm /dev/$DEVICE > fi > fi > + nm-online > + > + s=`ypwhich` > + echo "ypwhich $s" Oh, right, that would be my fault, sorry. I think I added the two lines following for debug purposes in a separate patch. In any case the workaround is fairly straight forward and you have been able to make your own patch. It's also worthwhile trying the current autofs update that's in updates testing in case that also resolves the problem. Ian We are finding that autofs still needs restarting after booting with Fedora 17. autofs-5.0.6-19.fc17.x86_64 systemd-44-17.fc17.x86_64r kernel-3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. (In reply to David Highley from comment #5) > We are finding that autofs still needs restarting after booting with Fedora > 17. > autofs-5.0.6-19.fc17.x86_64 > systemd-44-17.fc17.x86_64r > kernel-3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 Sadly I am still seeing problems with Fedora 25!! This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '25'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |