Bug 756252
Summary: | Permission verbs are not intuitively named | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Jeff Weiss <jweiss> |
Component: | WebUI | Assignee: | Partha Aji <paji> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Katello QA List <katello-qa-list> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.0.0 | CC: | dajohnso, mmccune |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-08-22 18:08:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 747354 |
Description
Jeff Weiss
2011-11-23 03:05:44 UTC
Giving Global/Orgs/RegisterSystems also allows removing systems. After discussing w partha, rephrasing the summary to match the true nature of the problem - the verbs are not intuitively named. <parthovsky> no you can edit also <parthovsky> jweiss: create implies you get to do everythign <jweiss> so... what is the difference between create and manage <parthovsky> manage is just edit [14:12] <parthovsky> create = create + edit + read + delete <jweiss> oh <jweiss> ok, i think we're going to have to fix that terminology <jweiss> that's not very intuitive <parthovsky> yes <parthovsky> thats a better bug <jweiss> to me "Manage" sounds like admin privs <parthovsky> ah <parthovsky> jweiss: I think jrist complained about that .. I ve just been slacking [14:13] <parthovsky> hehe <jweiss> so i suggest for all CRUD: "Manage". <jweiss> for just edit: "Edit" <parthovsky> hm that sounds better actually [14:14] <parthovsky> jrist: jsherrill: what da ya think <parthovsky> :) <parthovsky> mccun934: ^ <jsherrill> i like it <jsherrill> or maybe "Create and Manage" <jrist> yeah, it'd be fine if it were consistent, and understandable <jsherrill> just to differentiate from edit [14:15] <jweiss> what's currently called "Create" is full privileges right? <jweiss> we just need a word for that. "Administer"? <jweiss> or "Full control" [14:16] <jweiss> but "Create" is definitely not right <mccun934> parthovsky: yeah, we need to change the terms <mccun934> definitely confusing <parthovsky> jsherrill: sadly we neve managed to do the "description" part of the perms [14:17] <jsherrill> parthovsky: yeah, that would help <parthovsky> jrist: did you have any ideas about that [14:18] <parthovsky> mccun934: thinking of adding some sprint tasks this sprint on perms <parthovsky> may be 6 hrs :) <mccun934> parthovsky: that is fine, just do it at the end of the sprint [14:19] <jweiss> here's my suggestions: CRUD: Administer, C/R/U/D = those words - IOW change "Access" to "Read" <mccun934> Administer makes sense <parthovsky> jweiss: and edit is just edit right [14:21] <jweiss> "Access" to me is ambiguous - doesn't necessarily mean read only <jweiss> parthovsky: yeah, i guess, "Update" would work too [14:22] <jweiss> as for create, i suppose that verbs like "Register" in specific cases like systems also is fine <jweiss> parthovsky: i'll update the bz Should be fixed as of http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=katello.git;a=commit;h=037e109349abf6189494de6431d3aeb333ab8a6d mass ON_QA move Permission verbs are named better now, still not perfect but opened separate bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773761 Verified, katello-0.1.229-1.git.0.f2ad9e2.el6.noarch |