| Summary: | regression in samba credential verification | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel <daniel.distler> |
| Component: | samba | Assignee: | Guenther Deschner <gdeschner> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | asn, brian.dudek, gdeschner, jlayton, ssorce |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-02-13 14:26:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Daniel
2011-11-23 08:48:08 UTC
Can you please provide the output of testparm so we can see your configuration ? on Fedora 16 testparm prints: Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[printers]" Loaded services file OK. Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] workgroup = MYGROUP server string = Samba Server Version %v log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 idmap config * : backend = tdb cups options = raw [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes print ok = Yes browseable = No do you also need an output of Fedora 15, where it worked without explicit domain? I also see this in F16 but I don't know that being explicit with domain name is a "bad" thing but this does cause some confusion when using Nautilus. Connect to Server...when making a Windows Share connection user name must be specified as domain/share or the connection will fail. When the connection fails this is Samba server error log: [2011/12/12 12:03:13.765720, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:327() domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user dudek in domain mydomain to Domain controller MYDC. Error was NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. These are my F16 bits: samba-client-3.6.1-75.fc16.x86_64 nautilus-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64 I have no F15 systems to test with. So it looks like (as for smbclient) F16 works like RHEL 6.1 (which uses samba-client-3.5.6-86.el6_1.4.x86_64) AND F11 (which uses samba-client-3.4.7-0.50.fc11.i586) All three system produce this: [dudek@pinkerton ~]$ smbclient -U dudek //server/scratch Enter dudek's password: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE * in this case there is no Samba server log messages reporting an error [dudek@pinkerton ~]$ smbclient -U mydomain/dudek //server/scratch Enter mydomain/dudek's password: Domain=[MYDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.5.5] The same connection success and failure pattern when specifying a (or not) a domain is also seen when connecting to a Windows 2008 share server. I'm not sure we have an smbclient issue per se but there is a Nautilus implication. This message is a reminder that Fedora 16 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '16'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 16's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 16 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged to click on "Clone This Bug" and open it against that version of Fedora. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |