Bug 756830

Summary: [PATCH] Add $RPM_LD_FLAGS to lddlflags
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: perlAssignee: Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: cweyl, iarnell, kasal, lkundrak, mmaslano, ppisar, psabata, rc040203, tcallawa
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Patch
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.14.2-204 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-11-25 19:39:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Add $RPM_LD_FLAGS to lddlflags none

Description Ville Skyttä 2011-11-24 19:07:27 UTC 
Created attachment 536015 [details]
Add $RPM_LD_FLAGS to lddlflags

Perl is built without $RPM_LD_FLAGS, the attached patch fixes it.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155358.html

Additionally, most arch specific perl module builds will gain these flags automatically on rebuild after this fix is in; for example ExtUtils::MakeMaker does not provide a robust generic way to add $RPM_LD_FLAGS in module builds.

Want me to push and build this for devel?
Comment 1 Marcela Mašláňová 2011-11-25 09:25:17 UTC 
If it passed on all architectures, then yes, you can push it.
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2011-11-25 19:39:25 UTC 
Rawhide koji scratch builds for i686, x86_64, ppc, and ppc64 succeeded; arm-koji doesn't have a dist-rawhide target, and the s390 and sparc kojis seem to be having some unrelated issues at the moment, so I've pushed and built this.