Summary: | /etc/pam.d/ppp file incorrect? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Senie <dts> |
Component: | pam | Assignee: | Cristian Gafton <gafton> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1999-01-14 07:12:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: |
Description
Daniel Senie
1999-01-09 14:38:31 UTC
I have verified that the paths are indeed missing from the config file mentioned. This has been assigned to a developer for further review. Pam knows were to look for the modules by default, so the lack of the pathnames is not a problem (all files should be modified not to have path names, but we can not do that for completely different reasons) Also, "disabling" shadow won't help a bit on a non-shadowed system, as that is completely transparent, but it will cause great problems on the shadowed systems. |