| Summary: | aeolus-configure -p rhevm should check nfs export domain value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] CloudForms Cloud Engine | Reporter: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> |
| Component: | aeolus-configure | Assignee: | Richard Su <rwsu> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | wes hayutin <whayutin> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 1.0.0 | CC: | akarol, dajohnso, deltacloud-maint, dgao, ssachdev |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-05-15 20:43:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Dave Johnson
2011-11-29 21:38:36 UTC
Added a new step in aeolus-configure to query the RHEVM REST API to check the directory specified as the nfs export has storage domain type = "export". Fixed on: commit dcee3da3a7f8084b97d7334d173f23cb995f4a09 aeolus-configure-2.4.0-2 looks good err: /Stage[main]/Aeolus::Profiles::Rhevm/Web_request[rhevm-check-export-path-is-export-type]/get: change from to https://qeblade26.rhq.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com:8443/api/storagedomains?search=export failed: An exception was raised when invoking web request: Expecting //storage_domains/storage_domain/storage/path[text() = '/home/dajo/rhevh-data'] in the result notice: /Stage[main]/Aeolus::Profiles::Rhevm/Mount[/mnt/rhevm-nfs]: Dependency Web_request[rhevm-check-export-path-is-export-type] has failures: true warning: /Stage[main]/Aeolus::Profiles::Rhevm/Mount[/mnt/rhevm-nfs]: Skipping because of failed dependencies These bugs are verified, removing from ce-sprint Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0586.html |