Bug 75868

Summary:	some of the RHL guides are incorrect
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Robert P. J. Day <rpjday>
Component:	rhl-cg	Assignee:	Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	8.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-10-14 11:00:03 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert P. J. Day 2002-10-14 10:59:57 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830

Description of problem:
  first, the list of choices in filing a documentation bug in
bugzilla is not correct.  for instance, the description for the
component "rhl-cg" describes it as the configuration guide, when
it is in fact the customization guide.  similarly, the description
for rhl-sg is "official reference guide" when it's really the
security guide.  you might want to double-check the component
names to see that they're accurate and match their descriptions
for references to the official RHL guides.

  also, in the customization guide, chapter 13, "Controlling
access to services," in the paragraph before the Runlevels section,
there is confusion between the security config tool and the 
services config tool -- that paragraph mixes the two of them.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.read the documentation
2.
3.
	

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tammy Fox 2002-10-15 20:42:03 UTC

Thanks. I fixed the misreferences configuration tool in CVS for the next release
and in the HTML version on redhat.com/docs.

For the component names in Bugzilla, please file a bug against the Bugzilla
component.