Bug 758776

Summary: wrong group ownership of symlinks in -libs subpackage
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Karel Volný <kvolny>
Component: tog-pegasusAssignee: Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.8CC: azelinka, ovasik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 759064 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-02-21 06:22:20 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 758797    

Description Karel Volný 2011-11-30 17:19:53 UTC
Description of problem:
the new subpackage tog-pegasus-libs creates some symlinks in %post phase, but the ownership of the links is not set to the group "pegasus" (leaving the default "root") while this group is expected by default as set in %files section for the subpackage - this leads to rpm verification failures

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tog-pegasus-2.11.0-1.el5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -V tog-pegasus-libs
  
Actual results:
......G.    /usr/lib/Pegasus/providerManagers/libCMPIProviderManager.so
......G.    /usr/lib/Pegasus/providers/libComputerSystemProvider.so
......G.    /usr/lib/Pegasus/providers/libOSProvider.so
......G.    /usr/lib/Pegasus/providers/libProcessProvider.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libCIMxmlIndicationHandler.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libDefaultProviderManager.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libpegclient.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libpegcommon.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libpegprovider.so
......G.    /usr/lib/libsnmpIndicationHandler.so

Expected results:
(no errors)

Additional info:

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2011-12-05 12:00:16 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-02-21 06:22:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0257.html