Bug 759139

Summary:	Review Request: Nini - A .NET framework for reading INI files.
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Paul P Komkoff Jr <i>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Dan Mashal <dan.mashal>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	dan.mashal, i, mmmbauer, package-review
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	dan.mashal: fedora-review?
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-24 00:05:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description Paul P Komkoff Jr 2011-12-01 14:04:08 UTC

Spec URL: http://stingray.fedorapeople.org/review/Nini/Nini.spec
SRPM URL: http://stingray.fedorapeople.org/review/Nini/Nini-1.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: 
Nini is an uncommonly powerful .NET configuration library designed to help
build highly configurable applications quickly.

Comment 1 Paul P Komkoff Jr 2011-12-01 14:11:10 UTC

Apparently there's already a review in progress which I've missed when searching for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605840

The spec file there is substantially different, and review is stalled for a long time/submitter needs to be sponsored. I'll try to reach him and then one of two bugs will be marked as duplicate.

Comment 2 Dan Mashal 2013-03-03 22:32:35 UTC

I'll take this one or submit a new one if original requester is unresponsive.

Comment 3 Dan Mashal 2013-03-04 07:59:46 UTC

Hi this package looks good over all. Do you want to continue with the review process?

Comment 4 Mirco Bauer 2013-11-23 23:07:18 UTC

I didn't mean to delete flags, I only wanted to add me to CC. How can the flags changes be undone?

Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2013-11-24 00:05:40 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1000870 ***