| Summary: | "Receiving Email" port setting ignored during creation of new IMAP+ account | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Gabriel <gbauman> |
| Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | lucilanga, mbarnes, mcrha |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-05 19:52:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Gabriel
2011-12-03 06:55:42 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. I tried to, but I'm not able to reproduce this. What I did: - Edit->Preferences->Mail Accounts->Add - Continue - file email address as "a@b" - Continue - set server type to IMAP+ - set Server to "aaa.aa" - set Port to "666" - set Username to "aa" - Continue - Continue - set Server type to "sendmail" - Continue - Continue - Apply - Edit newly added account, observer Port in receiving being 666 I can also change order of Username and Port setting, but it does not change the result. I tried also with SMTP type, by setting only server name, but still no luck. I'm wondering whether this is related to an upstream bug [1], as some changes were done there for 3.2.3. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662789 Well, I'll be darned. I replicated this about three times before posting the bug, and now I can't make it happen any more. Version has not been bumped. I'm closing this WORKSFORME for the moment and will re-open if I encounter the problem again. Sorry for the spam. No problem. I'm afraid there are very specific steps how to reproduce this, and I was unable to repeat them for some reason. |