Bug 760187

Summary: tog-pegasus consumes libraries from tog-pegasus-libs but does not have explicit package version requirement
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek>
Component: tog-pegasusAssignee: Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.0CC: azelinka, psklenar
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No description necessary.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 760188 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 10:24:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Vitezslav Crhonek 2011-12-05 15:48:55 UTC
Please add Requires: tog-pegasus-libs = %{version}-%{release} to tog-pegasus in the specfile to avoid the need to test interoperability between the various combinations of old and new subpackages.

Comment 3 Suzanne Logcher 2012-02-14 23:22:40 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unfortunately unable to
address this request at this time. Red Hat invites you to
ask your support representative to propose this request, if
appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. If you would like it considered as an
exception in the current release, please ask your support
representative.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 10:24:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0418.html