Bug 761795 (GLUSTER-63)

Summary: Too many open files
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Basavanagowda Kanur <gowda>
Component: coreAssignee: Vijay Bellur <vbellur>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: mainlineCC: gluster-bugs, raghavendra, vijay
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: RTNR Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Basavanagowda Kanur 2009-06-25 06:33:35 UTC
[Migrated from savannah BTS] - bug 26746 [https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?26746]

Fri 05 Jun 2009 01:34:12 PM GMT, original submission:

I am receiving an error that states "Too many open files" when I try to copy large amounts of data to a glusterfs.

Thusfar I have take out the option 'write-behind' and it worked for awhile but still the same results.

My ulimit -a is:
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 77824
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 32
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 1024
pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority (-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 10240
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) 77824
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited

And uname -a:
Linux backup.localdomain 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:36:25 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mon 22 Jun 2009 06:11:12 PM GMT, comment #1 by Raghavendra <raghavendra>:

Hi,

Can you send glusterfs client and server log files?

regards,
Raghavendra.

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2009-11-16 08:25:53 UTC
Marking it invalid due to lack of details and since some fd leaks have been fixed from then.