Bug 76228

Summary: ghostscript.spec, gimp-print.spec mutual build dependencies
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Need Real Name <roblane>
Component: gimp-printAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.0   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-10-18 14:25:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2002-10-18 14:21:23 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021015

Description of problem:
Spec files for these two packages have mutually exclusive build dependencies. 






Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghostscript-7.05-20.src.rpm, gimp-print-4.2.1-5.src.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download SRPMS from rh8 mirror site to up2dated rh7.3 box.
2. Work through Dependency Hell, building and installing as needed
3. Found glitch at ghostscript.


Actual Results:  	
[/usr/src/redhat/SPECS]# rpm -bb ghostscript.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
        gimp-print-devel is needed by ghostscript-7.05-20
[/usr/src/redhat/SPECS]# rpm -bb gimp-print.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
        ghostscript-devel is needed by gimp-print-4.2.1-5


Expected Results:  build and install ghostscript, then build and install gimp-print

Additional info:

 I commented out the line in ghostscript.spec which requires gimp-print, and all
is well.

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2002-10-18 14:26:48 UTC
All is not well when you build---you'll find that the gimp-print-ijs driver no
longer works.

The fix will be to trick gimp-print into not needing ijs-config I expect.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 69576 ***