| Summary: | RPM build failed because libglusterfsclient.h not in distribution tarball | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Bernard Li <bernard> |
| Component: | build | Assignee: | Lakshmipathi G <lakshmipathi> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | nfs-beta | CC: | amarts, gluster-bugs, vijay |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Bernard Li
2010-09-17 00:42:34 UTC
Any chance this could be looked at soon? I've been testing the nfs_beta_rc's and it's just a tad annoying that I had to manually fix the spec file each time. Or should I be testing the 3.1 qa snapshots instead...? Thanks! Hi Bernard, Please use 3.1 qa releases. We have made NFS up to date in 3.1 branch (ie, same as NFS beta rc releases). (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Bernard, > > Please use 3.1 qa releases. We have made NFS up to date in 3.1 branch (ie, same > as NFS beta rc releases). Sounds good, I'll test the 3.1 qa releases then -- you can close this ticket, thanks. With 3.1.0beta onwards, NFS is kept up to date in mainline, hence users need not worry on NFSBeta branch anymore. |