| Summary: | 3.2.1qa2: display "probe is not successful" mesg when peers are not connected | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Lakshmipathi G <lakshmipathi> |
| Component: | cli | Assignee: | Amar Tumballi <amarts> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | mainline | CC: | gluster-bugs, sac, vraman |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | RTP | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Lakshmipathi G
2011-03-15 12:20:43 UTC
When gluster peer is probed for a machine that is not running glusterd, proper error message is not thrown. For eg: ================================================= [root@centos1 ~]# gluster peer probe 10.1.12.24 [root@centos1 ~]# echo $? 110 [root@centos1 ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 4 Hostname: 10.1.12.21 Uuid: ae170c47-4106-4016-85fe-37dbe6338f63 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.1.12.22 Uuid: 3c899292-6cb9-451d-9dcb-bf861318c298 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.1.12.23 Uuid: 276156df-63ae-4c1b-9b56-2bcf798f7041 State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) Hostname: 10.1.12.24 Uuid: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 State: Establishing Connection (Disconnected) [root@centos1 ~]# ================================================= Error message should be shown when probe was unsuccessful. Should the unsuccessful probe be shown in the list? Sacchi, Your comment is same as bug 763553, for which I have sent a patch here http://patches.gluster.com/patch/7746/ Lakshmipathi, Are we sure there were no 'iptables' rule on .51 machine? When you are done with current testing, can you see if this is still the case with 'master' branch. Regards, Amar not happening on later releases. |